IVS Analysis Report for RD1406 ($14AUG26XA) This report is the official IVS analysis report that corresponds to the database maintained by the IVS Data Centers for this session. (Analyzed by David Gordon, Goddard Space Flight Center. Spoolfile source: interactive solve/nuSolve analysis.) Problems: Kokee did not observe. Not much Hobart26 data. Parameterization comments: Using 8/40 clock/atm constraints due to noisy behavior at Hobart26. Other comments: Lots of zero codes, all stations. Mainly due to weak Gaia transfer sources. ----------------------------------------- Session Statistics Observations: 1512 scheduled 1107 correlated (in database) 609 recoverable (usable) 574 used Session fit: 32.460 ps ----------------------------------------- Station Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used FORTLEZA 400 198 187 46.8% HARTRAO 386 196 183 47.4% HOBART26 253 45 33 13.0% KOKEE 375 NOT CORR NOT CORR 0.0% NYALES20 561 242 236 42.1% WESTFORD 505 223 209 41.4% WETTZELL 544 314 300 55.1% --------------- --------- ----------- --------- ------ Station Total** 1512 609 574 38.0% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. ** Total includes distinct observations only. MISSED: Station was scheduled, but it did not observe. NOT CORR: Station was scheduled but not correlated. NOT USED: Usable data was generated for this station, but the analyst rejected it all. ----------------------------------------- Source Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Correlated* Used % of scheduled obs used 0137+012 15 11 3 20.0% 0211+171 15 15 0 0.0% 0241+622 109 59 0 0.0% 0312+100 13 13 7 53.8% 0325+395 27 8 6 22.2% 0410+110 80 65 25 31.2% 0454-463 21 18 15 71.4% 0812+020 6 3 1 16.7% 0823-223 58 48 1 1.7% 0912+297 23 23 0 0.0% 1046-409 21 15 2 9.5% 1104+728 52 24 14 26.9% 1143-332 6 2 1 16.7% 1251-197 15 11 0 0.0% 1333-152 7 2 0 0.0% 1333-337 9 2 0 0.0% 1908+484 53 32 8 15.1% 2135-184 5 5 0 0.0% 2145+082 28 19 4 14.3% 2239+096 72 62 52 72.2% 2314-409 18 16 9 50.0% 2329-415 11 4 0 0.0% 2353+816 57 27 27 47.4% 0528-250 50 36 23 46.0% 1330+022 72 65 49 68.1% 1424+240 42 21 19 45.2% 2029+024 42 31 5 11.9% 1348+308 150 116 36 24.0% 1022+194 113 88 40 35.4% 1215+303 127 86 58 45.7% 0059+581 24 20 18 75.0% 0458-020 6 6 6 100.0% 1144-379 1 1 1 100.0% 1334-127 8 7 7 87.5% 1424-418 4 2 2 50.0% 1803+784 18 14 14 77.8% 1958-179 4 3 3 75.0% 3C418 24 24 24 100.0% 2209+236 21 21 21 100.0% 0800+618 7 7 7 100.0% 2227-088 18 18 17 94.4% 1546+027 10 10 10 100.0% 1929+226 1 1 0 0.0% 2300-683 3 3 3 100.0% 0700-197 1 0 0 0.0% 0925-203 3 1 1 33.3% 1657-261 6 6 1 16.7% 0008-264 2 2 0 0.0% 0017+200 28 28 28 100.0% 0131-522 3 3 3 100.0% 1758-651 3 3 3 100.0% ------------ --------- ---------- ------ ------ Source Total 1512 1107 574 38.0% * Correlated: included in database ----------------------------------------- Baseline Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used FORTLEZA-HARTRAO 95 54 52 54.7% FORTLEZA-HOBART26 22 8 7 31.8% FORTLEZA-KOKEE 25 NOT CORR NOT CORR 0.0% FORTLEZA-NYALES20 66 24 23 34.8% FORTLEZA-WESTFORD 94 47 43 45.7% FORTLEZA-WETTZELL 98 65 62 63.3% HARTRAO-HOBART26 62 22 17 27.4% HARTRAO-KOKEE 0 NOT CORR NOT CORR 0.0% HARTRAO-NYALES20 73 30 29 39.7% HARTRAO-WESTFORD 43 18 18 41.9% HARTRAO-WETTZELL 113 72 67 59.3% HOBART26-KOKEE 90 NOT CORR NOT CORR 0.0% HOBART26-NYALES20 32 5 4 12.5% HOBART26-WESTFORD 18 3 DESELECTED 0.0% HOBART26-WETTZELL 29 7 5 17.2% KOKEE-NYALES20 104 NOT CORR NOT CORR 0.0% KOKEE-WESTFORD 105 NOT CORR NOT CORR 0.0% KOKEE-WETTZELL 51 NOT CORR NOT CORR 0.0% NYALES20-WESTFORD 139 84 81 58.3% NYALES20-WETTZELL 147 99 99 67.3% WESTFORD-WETTZELL 106 71 67 63.2% ----------------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------ Baseline Total 1512 609 574 38.0% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. MISSED: Baseline was scheduled, but at least one of the sites did not observe. NOT CORR: Baseline was scheduled but not correlated. NO DATA: The baseline's stations were both correlated, but they did not observe together. DESELECTED: Usable data was generated for the baseline, but the analyst rejected it.