IVS Analysis Report for AUST69 ($14DEC13XA) This report is the official IVS analysis report that corresponds to the database maintained by the IVS Data Centers for this session. (Analyzed by David Gordon, Goddard Space Flight Center. Spoolfile source: interactive solve/nuSolve analysis.) Problems: None. Parameterization comments: None. Other comments: None. ----------------------------------------- Session Statistics Observations: 3156 scheduled 3081 correlated (in database) 3036 recoverable (usable) 2962 used Session fit: 35.643 ps ----------------------------------------- Station Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HOBART12 1981 1896 1857 93.7% KATH12M 1982 1940 1892 95.5% WARK12M 368 317 309 84.0% YARRA12M 1981 1919 1866 94.2% --------------- --------- ----------- --------- ------ Station Total** 3156 3036 2962 93.9% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. ** Total includes distinct observations only. MISSED: Station was scheduled, but it did not observe. NOT CORR: Station was scheduled but not correlated. NOT USED: Usable data was generated for this station, but the analyst rejected it all. ----------------------------------------- Source Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Correlated* Used % of scheduled obs used 1633+38 24 24 21 87.5% 1741-038 93 83 76 81.7% 1921-293 96 91 90 93.8% 0637-752 96 94 84 87.5% 1334-127 102 89 83 81.4% 1308+326 27 25 24 88.9% 0826-373 39 39 39 100.0% 3C274 16 15 15 93.8% 2052-474 36 34 34 94.4% 1424-418 135 129 118 87.4% 1144-379 75 75 75 100.0% NRAO530 51 49 49 96.1% 1610-771 46 46 42 91.3% 1038+064 24 24 22 91.7% 1749+096 48 45 45 93.8% 1611+343 24 22 21 87.5% 1751+288 30 30 29 96.7% NRAO512 15 15 15 100.0% 1510-089 66 64 64 97.0% 1958-179 90 90 90 100.0% 1908-201 24 24 24 100.0% 1954-388 24 24 24 100.0% 0919-260 12 12 12 100.0% 1519-273 57 57 57 100.0% 1104-445 18 17 15 83.3% 1057-797 24 24 18 75.0% 2232-488 57 57 56 98.2% 1034-293 15 15 14 93.3% 2149-306 48 48 46 95.8% 2029+121 9 9 9 100.0% 2128-123 12 11 11 91.7% 2131-021 18 18 18 100.0% 2121+053 21 21 18 85.7% 2355-534 36 36 36 100.0% 2255-282 60 59 57 95.0% 2145+067 48 48 47 97.9% 2136+141 42 41 40 95.2% 3C446 51 50 50 98.0% 2243-123 15 15 15 100.0% 1255-316 39 39 35 89.7% CTA102 25 23 23 92.0% 2201+315 24 23 22 91.7% 0003-066 24 24 22 91.7% 1548+056 6 6 4 66.7% 0308-611 45 42 41 91.1% 0106+013 48 48 48 100.0% 1656+053 9 9 9 100.0% 0202-172 9 9 9 100.0% 0332-403 66 64 60 90.9% 0119+115 48 46 45 93.8% 0426-380 63 63 61 96.8% 0229+131 33 31 31 93.9% 0202+319 18 18 16 88.9% CTA26 51 50 50 98.0% 0537-441 72 72 71 98.6% 0234+285 30 30 29 96.7% 0454-234 81 81 78 96.3% 0521-365 66 66 66 100.0% 0420-014 51 50 50 98.0% NRAO190 30 29 29 96.7% 1758-651 9 9 9 100.0% NRAO140 12 12 10 83.3% 0607-157 78 75 66 84.6% 0528+134 39 39 38 97.4% 0648-165 39 38 38 97.4% 0537-286 12 12 12 100.0% 0727-115 102 101 94 92.2% 0723-008 27 27 27 100.0% 0552+398 18 18 18 100.0% 0834-201 54 54 54 100.0% 0657+172 18 18 18 100.0% 0748+126 39 39 39 100.0% OJ287 39 39 39 100.0% 4C39.25 30 30 30 100.0% 0738+313 9 9 6 66.7% 0208-512 9 9 9 100.0% 1128+385 21 21 18 85.7% 1144+402 15 15 13 86.7% 1156+295 12 12 10 83.3% 0516-621 12 12 12 100.0% ------------ --------- ---------- ------ ------ Source Total 3156 3081 2962 93.9% * Correlated: included in database ----------------------------------------- Baseline Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HOBART12-KATH12M 929 909 892 96.0% HOBART12-WARK12M 123 100 99 80.5% HOBART12-YARRA12M 929 887 866 93.2% KATH12M-WARK12M 123 108 105 85.4% KATH12M-YARRA12M 930 923 895 96.2% WARK12M-YARRA12M 122 109 105 86.1% ----------------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------ Baseline Total 3156 3036 2962 93.9% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. MISSED: Baseline was scheduled, but at least one of the sites did not observe. NOT CORR: Baseline was scheduled but not correlated. NO DATA: The baseline's stations were both correlated, but they did not observe together. DESELECTED: Usable data was generated for the baseline, but the analyst rejected it.