IVS Analysis Report for AUST61 ($14NOV22XA) This report is the official IVS analysis report that corresponds to the database maintained by the IVS Data Centers for this session. (Analyzed by David Gordon, Goddard Space Flight Center. Spoolfile source: interactive solve/nuSolve analysis.) Problems: No good data at Kath12M first ~8.7 hrs, recorder and DBBC problems. Wark12M missed first ~8 hrs, late start. Parameterization comments: None. Other comments: None. ----------------------------------------- Session Statistics Observations: 3123 scheduled 2835 correlated (in database) 2173 recoverable (usable) 2120 used Session fit: 40.670 ps ----------------------------------------- Station Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HOBART12 1959 1482 1444 73.7% KATH12M 1962 1200 1165 59.4% WARK12M 363 188 185 51.0% YARRA12M 1962 1476 1446 73.7% --------------- --------- ----------- --------- ------ Station Total** 3123 2173 2120 67.9% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. ** Total includes distinct observations only. MISSED: Station was scheduled, but it did not observe. NOT CORR: Station was scheduled but not correlated. NOT USED: Usable data was generated for this station, but the analyst rejected it all. ----------------------------------------- Source Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Correlated* Used % of scheduled obs used 0834-201 54 50 47 87.0% 1308+326 27 21 15 55.6% NRAO530 45 41 20 44.4% 0637-752 96 90 72 75.0% 1424-418 132 88 52 39.4% 1334-127 96 67 51 53.1% 1656+053 9 7 5 55.6% 1758-651 12 10 7 58.3% 1156+295 9 7 5 55.6% 1510-089 69 53 30 43.5% 1144-379 81 77 56 69.1% 0454-810 84 78 39 46.4% 1038+064 18 16 14 77.8% 1741-038 87 38 11 12.6% 1519-273 60 58 34 56.7% 0826-373 36 33 28 77.8% 1611+343 27 24 7 25.9% 1057-797 87 85 51 58.6% 0919-260 9 7 7 77.8% 1034-293 9 6 1 11.1% 1255-316 42 37 33 78.6% 1749+096 48 40 12 25.0% 1921-293 93 69 40 43.0% 1633+38 21 21 6 28.6% 1908-201 24 23 9 37.5% 2142-758 9 9 7 77.8% 3C274 13 13 5 38.5% 1954-388 9 9 3 33.3% 2052-474 24 23 10 41.7% NRAO512 15 15 5 33.3% 1751+288 30 30 10 33.3% 1958-179 90 69 44 48.9% 1610-771 36 36 32 88.9% 1920-211 4 4 2 50.0% 2149-306 48 46 26 54.2% 2029+121 12 12 7 58.3% 2128-123 12 12 4 33.3% 2232-488 48 48 29 60.4% 1104-445 18 18 11 61.1% 2255-282 63 61 46 73.0% 2355-534 27 27 16 59.3% 2131-021 24 24 16 66.7% 2145+067 48 46 31 64.6% 2136+141 42 35 20 47.6% 3C446 48 46 31 64.6% 2243-123 18 16 6 33.3% CTA102 30 27 17 56.7% 2201+315 25 22 13 52.0% 0003-066 21 21 17 81.0% 0308-611 33 33 26 78.8% 2121+053 24 22 19 79.2% 0106+013 42 40 35 83.3% 0202-172 9 9 7 77.8% 0332-403 57 57 52 91.2% 0119+115 24 21 19 79.2% 0426-380 48 48 48 100.0% 0516-621 21 21 20 95.2% 0229+131 21 21 20 95.2% 0202+319 24 24 24 100.0% CTA26 33 33 33 100.0% 0537-441 69 67 61 88.4% 0234+285 30 30 29 96.7% 0521-365 57 55 55 96.5% 0454-234 75 75 75 100.0% 0420-014 39 39 37 94.9% NRAO190 27 27 25 92.6% NRAO140 9 9 6 66.7% 0607-157 72 71 68 94.4% 0537-286 15 15 15 100.0% 0528+134 30 30 28 93.3% 0648-165 45 45 45 100.0% 0727-115 93 93 93 100.0% 0723-008 24 24 21 87.5% 0657+172 27 27 27 100.0% 0552+398 18 18 11 61.1% 0748+126 36 35 35 97.2% OJ287 39 39 39 100.0% 0738+313 12 12 11 91.7% 4C39.25 33 32 32 97.0% 0208-512 9 9 9 100.0% 1128+385 21 21 18 85.7% 0230-790 6 6 5 83.3% 1144+402 12 12 12 100.0% ------------ --------- ---------- ------ ------ Source Total 3123 2835 2120 67.9% * Correlated: included in database ----------------------------------------- Baseline Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HOBART12-KATH12M 919 576 554 60.3% HOBART12-WARK12M 121 63 63 52.1% HOBART12-YARRA12M 919 843 827 90.0% KATH12M-WARK12M 121 58 57 47.1% KATH12M-YARRA12M 922 566 554 60.1% WARK12M-YARRA12M 121 67 65 53.7% ----------------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------ Baseline Total 3123 2173 2120 67.9% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. MISSED: Baseline was scheduled, but at least one of the sites did not observe. NOT CORR: Baseline was scheduled but not correlated. NO DATA: The baseline's stations were both correlated, but they did not observe together. DESELECTED: Usable data was generated for the baseline, but the analyst rejected it.